Home

PENALTY SHARING COMMUNITY

Contact

Donate

Funding the War
STRATCOM
Iraq
Palestine
Guantanamo
Nonviolent Philosophy

IPN Resource Library & Shop

News

Dovetail newsletter

Pictures

Conscientious

Objectors

Counter Recruitment

Environmental

Issues

Local, Organic Food

Simple Living

Sustainable Resources

Peace & Justice Links

About
 
 

 

The Approaching War with Iran:

Part 1 & Part 2

January 4, 2006 – On November 10th 2005, the Muckraker Report published an article that described one of the unspoken reasons why the United States had to invade Iraq; to liberate the U.S. dollar in Iraq so that Iraqi oil could once again be purchased with the petrodollar.  See The liberation of the U.S. Dollar in Iraq

 

In November 2000, Iraq stopped accepting U.S. dollars for its oil.  Counted as a purely political move, Saddam Hussein switched the currency required to purchase Iraqi oil to the euro.  Selling oil through the U.N. Oil for Food Program, Iraq converted all of its U.S. dollars in its U.N. account to the euro.  Shortly thereafter, Iraq converted $10 billion in its U.N. reserve fund to the euro.  By the end of 2000, Iraq had abandoned the U.S. dollar completely.  

 

 

Two months after the United States invaded Iraq, the Oil for Food Program was ended, the country’s accounts were switched back to dollars, and oil began to be sold once again for U.S. dollars.  No longer could the world buy oil from Iraq with the euro.  Global U.S. dollar supremacy was restored.  It is interesting to note that the latest recession which the United States endured began and ended within the same time frame as that during which Iraq was trading oil for euros.  Whether this is a coincidence or related, the American people may never know. 

 

In March 2006, Iran will take Iraq’s switch to the petroeuro to new heights by launching a third oil exchange.  The Iranians have developed a petroeuro system for oil trade which, when enacted, will once again threaten U.S. dollar supremacy far greater than Iraq’s euro conversion.  Called the Iran Oil Bourse, an exchange that only accepts the euro for oil sales would mean that the entire world could begin purchasing oil from any oil-producing nation with euros instead of dollars.  The Iranian plan isn’t limited to purchasing one oil-producing country’s oil with euros.  Its plan will create a global alternative to the U.S. dollar.  Come March 2006, the Iran Oil Bourse will further the momentum of OPEC to create an alternate currency for oil purchases worldwide.  China, Russia, and the European Union are evaluating the Iranian plan to exchange oil for euros and giving the plan serious consideration. 

 

If you are skeptical regarding the meaning of oil being purchased with euros versus dollars and the devastating impact it will have on the economy of the United States, consider the historic move by the Federal Reserve to begin hiding information pertaining to the U.S. dollar money supply starting in March 2006.  Since 1913, the year the abomination known as the Federal Reserve came to power, the supply of U.S. dollars was measured and publicly revealed through an index referred to as M-3.  M-3 has been the main staple of money supply measurement and transparent disclosure since the Fed was founded.  In his report, What’s the Fed up to with the money supply?, Robert McHugh writes, “On November 10, 2005, shortly after appointing Bernanke to replace Greenbackspan, the Fed mysteriously announced with little comment and no palatable justification that they will hide M-3 effective March 2006.”  (To learn more about Robert McHugh's work, please visit https://www.technicalindicatorindex.com/Default.asp)

 

Is it mere coincidence that the Fed will begin hiding M-3 the same month that Iran will launch its Iran Oil Bourse, or is there a direct threat to the stability of the U.S. dollar, the U.S. economy, and the U.S. standard of living?  Are Americans being set up for a collapse in our economy that will make the Great Depression of the 1930’s look like a bounced check?  If you cannot or will not make the value and stability of the U.S. currency of personal importance, if you are unwilling to demand from your elected officials, an immediate abolishment of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the fiat money scheme that the banking cartel has used for nearly a century now to keep our government and our people in a state of perpetual debt, than you are faced with but two alternatives, abject poverty, or invading Iran. 

 

The plans to invade Iran are unspoken, but unfolding before our very eyes.  The media has been reporting on Iran more often, and increasingly harshly.  For the U.S. government to justify invading Iran, it must first begin to phase out the War in Iraq, which it is already doing.  Next, it must portray the Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, as a threat to the region and the world.  Finally, once naive American people are convinced the “weapons of mass destruction” that were to be found in Iraq are actually in Iran, coupled with the almost daily media coverage of Iran’s nuclear power / weapons program aspirations, and what we will soon have on our hands is another fabricated war that will result in tens of thousands of civilian lives being lost, all because the political elected pawns in Washington DC lack the discipline to return our currency to a gold or silver standard, end the relationship with the foreign banking cartel called the Federal Reserve, and limit the activities of the U.S. government to those articulated in Article I Section 8 of the Constitution for the United States of America. 

 

When a wayward and corrupt fiscal policy and fiat currency, coupled with runaway government spending, forces a nation to only be able to sustain the value of its currency with bullets, the citizenry of the country involved in wars primarily to sustain its currency have historically first became slaves to their government, and then to the nations that finally conquer them.  If you question the validity of such a premise, or whether it could happen to the United States of America, study the fall of the Roman Empire.  If you read the right books on the subject, you’ll quickly discover that towards the end of the Roman reign, the Roman Empire was doing exactly what America is doing today; attempting to sustain a failed fiat money system with bullets. 

 

Understanding fiat money is not an easy task, and the Federal Reserve, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund have purposely made it that way.  They do not want the American people to realize that the money in their wallet loses its value with each new dollar that they print.  They do not want people to understand that our money does not become money until it is borrowed.  When the Federal Reserve has money printed, when it is in uncut sheets of paper, it is not yet money.  After it is cut, bundled, and placed into the Federal Reserve vaults, it still is not money.  It only becomes money once it is borrowed.  Consequently, if all debt were to be paid, if the United States didn’t have an $8 trillion national debt and the American people were debt free, and if all loans of U.S. dollars made to foreigners were paid in full, there would be exactly zero U.S. dollars in circulation because it will have all been returned to the vaults of the Federal Reserve. This might seem hard to fathom, but it is the gospel of fiat money. 

 

The major news media in the United States, fed by Washington DC which in turn is fed by the Federal Reserve, literally, has already begun conditioning the American people for invading Iran.  Media accounts of Iran’s nuclear ambitions along with amplification of the potential instability and core evilness of Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is setting the stage to spring the invasion of Iran on the American people.  There does appear to be a direct correlation between the winding down effort underway in Iraq and the increase of anti-Iran rhetoric.  How American soldiers ultimately arrive in Tehran is uncertain at this time, but it is reasonable to expect that if the Iran Oil Bourse opens for business in March 2006 as planned, it will only be a matter of time before the United States will have to blow it up. 

 

If the United States invades Iran, or if Israel starts military actions by launches missiles at Iran’s nuclear power facilities, which then opens the door for the United States to intervene, most Americans will believe that our military actions in Iran will be to defend freedom and liberty while spreading democracy, when the truth is that we’ll be fighting a war in Iran because of our nation’s relationship with the Federal Reserve, a so-called bank that is not owned by the federal government, maintains no reserve, and isn’t a bank at all, but a cartel.  Just like our war in Iraq, Americans and foreigners will die in battle so that the historical power bankers and brokers; cartel members such as Rothschild, Morgan, Lehman, Lizard, Schrader, Lobe, Kuhn, and Rockefeller to name a few, can continue collecting interest on every single U.S. coin and dollar bill in circulation, while controlling the U.S. Congress to the extent that the U.S. taxpayer becomes the collateral and lender of last resort to cover bad loans and unpaid debts that these institutions create by loaning money to third world countries, some of which are devout enemies of the United States.  Remember the $400 billion savings & loan bailout approved by the U.S. Congress during the Reagan Administration?  America is still paying for it – you and me, and so will our children and grandchildren. 

 

It is well overdue for Americans, every American, to do whatever it takes to fully understand the relationship between the United States and the Federal Reserve, along with the grave consequences of our current fiat money system.  For even if the United States wanted to continue to sustain the supremacy of the U.S. dollar with bullets, it is historically, impossible.  When bullets become the commodity to secure a currency, it is a clear sign of devastating calamity looming.  To ignore the warning signs is to suffer like you have never suffered before, or to die.  Harsh words, but true. 

Freelance writer / author, Ed Haas, is the editor and columnist for the Muckraker ReportGet smart.  Read the Muckraker Report.  [http://teamliberty.net]  To learn more about Ed’s current and previous work, visit Crafting Prose[http://craftingprose.com]   

Part 2:

The approaching war with Iran: Part II

How real is the Iran nuclear threat to the United States?

 

January 19, 2006 – If you get your news from the Big Five, the global media conglomeration of Time Warner, The Walt Disney Company, Bertelsmann AG, Viacom, and News Corporation, which when combined control approximately 90% of the world’s headlines, than there is little doubt that you have been adequately primed with stories regarding Iran’s nuclear power ambitions and the threat that such ambitions represent to the United States.  Absent perspective though, these headlines amount to nothing more than fear-mongering hype intended to persuade Americans into supporting the Federal Reserve, U.S. Congress, and Bush Administration once again if they collectively decide that it’s necessary to launch yet another pre-emptive strike in the Middle East under flimsy, if not false pretenses.

 

The fact is that Iran wants nuclear power.  It wants to join a growing list of countries that already enjoy the benefits of nuclear power.  Which countries currently have nuclear power plants operating within their borders?  The list might surprise you.  Argentina, Armenia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Japan, South Korea, Lithuania, Mexico, Netherlands, Pakistan, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and the United States.  According to the Uranium Information Centre[1] there are a total of 441 operable reactors in these countries. 

 

Countries that are exploring or actively seeking nuclear power capabilities include Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, North Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam.  The countries that are known to have stockpiles of nuclear weapons are Russia, the United States, France, China, Great Britain, Pakistan, and India.  Israel is considered a de facto nuclear power by most observers, although it has long maintained that it will neither confirm nor deny whether it has nuclear weapons.  North Korea is suspected to have joined the list of nuclear powers in 2005.  South Africa once had nuclear weapons but has since reportedly destroyed the weapons, but not the capacity to manufacture them again if necessary.

 

Given the fact that nuclear power plants are currently operating in 31 countries with 7 more countries in pursuit of atomic energy, is it possible that the United States of America is honestly threatened by Iran seeking nuclear power capabilities?  And given the fact that there are currently approximately 31,000 nuclear warheads deployed or in reserve in the stockpiles of eight countries: China, France, India, Israel, Pakistan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States, is it plausibly that Iran, even if it had 20 nuclear warheads, wouldn’t be pulverized if it ever attempted to launch a nuclear weapon against the United States or any of our allies? Nuclear or not, Iran will never be a nuclear threat to the United States.   It is a mathematical improbability.  According to Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, of these 31,000 nuclear warheads, about 13,000 are deployed and 4,600 of these are on high alert, i.e. ready to be launched within minutes notice. The combined explosive yield of these weapons is approximately 5,000 megatons, which is about 200,000 times the explosive yield of the bomb used on Hiroshima.[2]   None of these nukes are in Tehran’s control.  With this perspective intact, is it possible that the United States of America is really threatened by Iran’s nuclear ambitions?  It does not seem possible, yet the propaganda machine is churning out battle cries daily that do not match reality.  That’s what propaganda is, words masquerading as news that defy and deny reality.

 

The truth be told, Iran’s current nuclear ambitions, whether for peaceful purposes or not, do not pose any greater threat to the United States then when Pakistan became a nuclear power in 1988.  Prior to Pakistan becoming a nuclear power, Muslim countries in the Middle East were surrounded by non-Muslim nuclear powers.  Therefore, beginning in 1970’s, Pakistan viewed the development of a nuclear bomb as its last resort and only defense against being invaded by India or the Soviet Union.  There are many historical indications that Pakistan was most likely correct in its assessment regarding the need to become a nuclear power.   In 1979, when Afghanistan was invaded by the Soviet Union, Pakistan feared becoming a future target of Soviet aggression.  To make matters worse, in 1980, Pakistan was told that the United States would not commit forces to defend Pakistan if the Soviet Union invaded.  This lack of support from the United States made any claimed alliance between Pakistan and the United States doubtful in the eyes of the Pakistani people, and only increased Pakistan’s urgent approach towards becoming a nuclear power. 

 

Although relations between Pakistan and the United States have improved significantly since September 11, 2001, it is a matter of fact that Pakistan played a vital roll in helping Iran and North Korea advance their nuclear programs during the 1990’s.  In other words, without Pakistan’s assistance, it is likely that the Iran nuclear hysteria would not be possible today.  Regardless of past cooperation between Pakistan and the nuclear pursuits of Iran and North Korea, the rhetoric suggesting that a future nuclear-powered Iran presents a clear and present danger to the Middle East and the United States simply cannot be substantiated when measured against the number of countries that currently operate nuclear power plants and the staggering amount of nuclear warheads stockpiled around the world that are controlled by the United States and its allies. 

 

The Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States clearly demonstrated the positive power to be found in fearing a nuclear counterattack.  If either the Soviet Union or the United States would not have been a nuclear power during the Cold War, it is reasonable to suggest that the country possessing nuclear warheads would have invaded the one that did not, thus making the Cold War, hot.  The governments of India and Pakistan intensely distrust if not despise each other, but knowing that each side has nuclear weapons has restrained either side from launching all out invasions on the other ever since both became nuclear powers.  In both the Soviet Union vs. United States and India vs. Pakistan nuclear showdowns, President Ronald Reagan’s tactical strategy, “Peace through superior firepower” proved flexible enough to withstand being minimized to “Peace through similar firepower”, and remain a fundamental truth. 

 

It is worth noting that during the 1990’s, Pakistan considered Iran as its closest regional ally.  However, times have changed this alliance.  Iran is now a fundamental Shiite haven with a government to match.  Pakistan on the other hand is sliding toward an ideological Sunni state.  Shiites are outraged by Pakistan’s cooperation with the United States, with most viewing the Unites States / Pakistan relationship as an unholy alliance that amounts to nothing less than blasphemy.  If tensions between Iran and Pakistan escalate as expected, then Iran’s pursuit of a nuclear weapon will mirror Pakistan’s urgency to develop a nuclear weapon in the 70’s and 80’s to defend itself against a nuclear India. 

 

Iran also knows what the world knows but Israel will not admit; that Israel is a nuclear power with an overwhelmingly decisive military advantage over Iran.  Iran might spout words of hate towards Israel, but they do not dare launch missiles, because unlike the United States, Israel doesn’t fight wars for oil.  It fights wars for survival, and will not hesitate destroying Iran’s oil reserves if it determines such military actions to be tactically advantageous. 

 

The bottom line is that Iran’s nuclear ambitions are well documented and have existed for more than two decades.  Pakistan played a vital role in advancing the nuclear capabilities of both Iran and North Korea in the 1990’s.  As Pakistan moves closer to the United States, and with 130,000 U.S troops in Iraq, Iran is being pushed into a weapon of last resort scenario similar to that of Pakistan when India became a nuclear power.  In January 2006, the Big Five media conglomeration has fired up the propaganda presses and aggressively started churning out the Iran Nuclear Threat headlines at an alarming pace, even though there is really nothing new about Iran’s 20-year-old nuclear ambitions.  When measured against the list of 31 countries that currently operate nuclear power plants, the 7 that are pursuing nuclear power, the 31,000 nuclear warheads already distributed around the world, the fact that Israel is a nuclear power, and the United States having 130,000 troops in neighboring Iraq while building permanent military installations faster than George Bush can say 9/11, nuclear or not, Iran is of no military consequence to the United States or Israel, and it will not be for generations to come, if ever. 

 

If Iran’s desire to have access to nuclear power is old news, which it is, then why is it being splashed as breaking headlines across the world?  Why now?  What has happened thus far in 2006 that was not happening in 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005?  Did uranium enrichment equipment and facilities suddenly and surprisingly appear on the Iranian landscape?  Is Iran’s announcement that it has restarted its uranium enrichment research; the Big Five called it breaking the seals on its uranium enrichment equipment, which sounds vaporously spooky, when all it really means is that Iran unlocked the doors of the facilities that house the uranium enrichment equipment and turned the lights on once again; is this action an actual threat to the security of the United States of America?  No, it is not. 

 

So what is it?  What is Iran doing that has the Big Five, the Federal Reserve Banking Cartel, U.S. Congress, and the Executive Branch Bushians urgently leading the misinformed American people down the road of “we found those weapons of mass destruction we were looking for in Iraq, in Iran”?   If Iran’s nuclear ambitions don’t add up to the propaganda, which it does not, what does? 

 

In a December 16, 2005 Associated Press article, President Bush said that Iran is a “real threat” to the United States and called on Tehran to “prove it does not seek nuclear weapons.”  Sound familiar?  Just a few years earlier, Bush challenged Iraq to prove it didn’t have weapons of mass destruction.  Saddem Hussein said that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction.  But how do you prove you don’t have something?  Vilified and scorned U.N. Weapons Inspector, Scott Ritter repeatedly told the Big Five that Iraq did not have active weapons of mass destruction programs prior to the Bushians launching its pre-emptive strike. 

 

The truth is that Iran stands about as much chance of convincing President Bush that they are not seeking nuclear weapons as the nineteen men and women convicted in 1692 by the Massachusetts Puritans for practicing witchcraft did in convincing the Puritans that they were not witches.   The Executive Branch Bushians know that Iran’s nuclear ambitions are of no real threat to the United States, but believe that Americans will take the nuclear threat bait.  Either way, the Executive Branch Bushians, along with the Federal Reserve Banking Cartel, and the U.S. Congress, need this new lie to stick firmly in the minds of approximately half of the population of the United States so that it can go about the business of thwarting the real threat that Iran posed to the United States.  And yes, Iran does pose a real threat to the United States, a clear and present danger far worst than anything the Big Five is reporting.  Why the Big Five is not reporting on the real economical “nuclear bomb” that Iran already possesses serves as evidence to the intuitive American that this unspoken threat is absolutely real.  In March 2006, Iran will break the seals on its Iran Oil Bourse. 

 

If you are not familiar with the Iran Oil Bourse, you need to Google it promptly.  Thankfully, many reporters, commentators, and scholars that operate in the 10% zone not controlled by the Big Five have wrote outstanding articles and analysis regarding the true implications of the Iran Oil Bourse.  In fact, there seems to be a new article on the subject, released daily.  On January 15, 2006, Krassimir Petov, Ph. D. wrote The Proposed Iranian Oil Bourse.  His analysis: the proposed Iranian Oil Bourse will accelerate the fall of the American Empire.  His qualifications: Petrov received his Ph.D. in economics from Ohio State University and currently teaches Macroeconomics, International Finance, and Econometrics at the American University in Bulgaria.  In his article, Petov recommends reading two works by William Clark: The Real Reasons for the Upcoming War in Iraq, and The Real Reasons Why Iran is the Next Target. 

 

Here are the key points made by Krassimir Petov, Ph. D. in his report: The Proposed Iranian Oil Bourse.

 

·         The Iranian government has finally developed the ultimate “nuclear” weapon that can swiftly destroy the financial system underpinning the American Empire

·         The weapon is the Iran Oil Bourse slated to open in March 2006

·         With the opening of the Iran Oil Bourse:

o        Europeans will no longer have to buy and hold U.S. Dollars in order to secure payment for oil.  They will be able to purchase oil with their own currencies, the euro.

o        The Chinese and Japanese will be especially eager to adopt the Iran Oil Bourse because it will allow them to drastically reduce their enormous dollar reserves and diversify with euros, thus protecting themselves against the depreciation of the U.S. Dollar.

o        Russians have an inherent economic interest in adopting the euro because the bulk of its trade is with European countries

o        The Arab-oil exporting countries also need to diversify against the rising mountains of U.S. debt notes – the depreciating dollar

 

What the Iran Oil Bourse means to the average American is that suddenly, hundreds of billions of U.S. dollars will become unwanted around the world.  In essence, the money supply will double or triple.  When supply outweighs demand, prices go down – except when dealing with currency.  When money supply exceeds demand, prices go up.  Its called inflation – the hidden tax brought to the U.S. taxpayer courtesy of the Federal Reserve Banking Cartel and our friends in the U.S. Congress.  Imagine if every Americans income doubled in next week’s paycheck.  Do you think prices for goods and services would decrease, remain the same, or increase?  If you think they would decrease or remain the same, can I interest you in a hot stock I’m selling called Enron? 

 

Another way to think about the U.S. dollar is in terms of a company stock.  Speaking of Enron, when the truth about this company’s finances hit the street, what happened to the value of the stock?  It plummeted.  Why?  In theory, the news of false financials didn’t directly cause the stock value to drop.   It dropped because there were more sellers than buyers.  From its highs of $90 per share, Enron quickly became worthless in the span of a few weeks.  Everyone who held shares of Enron, simultaneously sold their stock, and there was nobody willing to buy the shares.  The situation with the U.S. dollars is very similar.  If enough people and countries stop holding U.S. dollars, the value of the dollar in your wallet will plummet.  The greenback will go the way of the Continental.  In 1775 the Continental Congress authorized the issuance of paper money to finance the American War for Independence. These notes, known as "Continentals," would be redeemable only after the colonies won their independence. Overprinted and distrusted by the public, they declined rapidly in value, giving rise to the popular expression "not worth a Continental."

 

So what are the real options that the United States of America has to protect its security and financial stability?  Option A is to believe the Big Five propaganda machine financed by the Federal Reserve Banking Cartel that prints our funny money, and take our chances with invading Iran to thwart the March 2006 launch of the Iran Oil Bourse.  To some that might sound appealing, but such action will not change the fact that our federal government has been operating on a Federal Reserve credit card, which has no credit limit, for so long that We the People now have a $8 trillion dollar national debt.  The Federal Reserve Banking Cartel loves this enormous debt because it represents interest payments from the U.S. taxpayer to its network of private corporations.  The ability of the federal government to tax incomes, on behalf of the Federal Reserve Banking Cartel, before the wage earner ever receives his or her paycheck, makes hard-working men and women slaves to the Federal Reserve Banking Cartel.  The U.S. Congress supports using the citizenry as collateral for its wayward spending, for without the Federal Reserve Banking Cartel accepting as collateral, the birth certificates of American citizens and the potential, future taxable wages that they represent, the federal government could no longer finance its 1174 federal agencies and the payroll associated with 4.3 federal employees. 

 

Option B is to abolish the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 immediately, eliminate seventy-five percent of the 1174 federal agencies and the millions of federal mandates they represent, seize all gold held by the banking cartel, allow the cartel member’s financial institutions to collapse while forgiving all debt owed to the cartel, return the printing and coining of money to the U.S. Treasury, eliminate fractional and fiat money schemes, and return our currency to a commodity backed system such as gold and silver.  Finally, there is need to amend the Constitution of the United States of America so as to abolish the 16th Amendment and add language that would prevent the federal government of the United States from deficit spending or operating with a national debt ever again. 

 

There really are no other options, and March 2006 is fast approaching.  This is not a doomsday scenario.  It is fact.  The fiat money scheme run by the Federal Reserve Banking Cartel is about to collapse.  Meanwhile the President of the United States, the U.S. Congress, Federal Reserve Banking Cartel, and the Big Five media conglomeration are so fearful of the court of public opinion in the United States, that they will not even utter the words, Iran Oil Bourse. 

 

On a personal note: I have two sons, ages 18 and 15.  I myself am a veteran who served ten years in the United States Marine Corps.  Arguably, we are all hawks.  There are wars worth fighting, and there remain causes worth dying for in defense of the United States of America.  Sustaining the Federal Reserve Banking Cartel, a failed fiat m

iled fiat money scheme, and a federal government out of control, is. 

 

It’s time for the We the People of these United States to spread the word and truth regarding the real threat Iran poses to the United States, and act boldly to fix our own government and money system so that we no longer are required to fight wars to maintain the stability of our own currency.   

 


[1] Uranium Information Centre, Melbourne, Australia, World Nuclear Power Reactors 2004-06, January 4, 2006, http://www.uic.com.au/reactors.htm, [Accessed January 17, 2006]

[2] Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, Nuclear Stockpiles, http://www.nuclearfiles.org/menu/key-issues/nuclear-weapons/basics/nuclear-stockpiles.htm#, [Accessed January 17, 2006]

Freelance writer / author, Ed Haas, is the editor and columnist for the Muckraker ReportGet smart.  Read the Muckraker Report.  [http://teamliberty.net]  To learn more about Ed’s current and previous work, visit Crafting Prose[http://craftingprose.com]