War Without End Forum Index War Without End
The global war against terror from a British perspective
 
 FAQ   Popular Topics   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register 
 Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
 UK and World News   

USA = 4th Reich?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    War Without End Forum Index -> Middle East and Asia
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 12:53 am    Post subject: USA = 4th Reich? Reply to topic

The Author has asked that this analysis and commentary be widely disseminated.

Born on December 18, 1962 to an Iowa farm family largely of German descent, Michael Luick-Thrams earned his Ph.D. in Modern European History (focus: Nazi Germany) from Humboldt Universitaet in Berlin.

Now the executive director of a non-profit educational organization (see http://www.traces.org/), he and his team document Germans and Upper Midwesterners as they came into contact between 1933 and 1945. His publications include: "In the Eagle's Shadow: Eleven U.S. Americans inside Nazi Germany" (master's thesis), "Out of Hitler's Reach: The
Scattergood Hostel for European Refugees, 1939-43", "Creating 'New Americans': WWII-Era European Refugees' Formation of American Identities" (doctoral dissertation, accessible via
http://dochost.rz.hu-berlin.de/dissertationen/history/Luick-Thrams-Michael-1997-07-02/HTML/),
"Enemies Within: Iowa POWs in Nazi Germany" (editor) and "Signs of Life/Lebenszeichen: The Correspondence of German POWs at Camp Algona, Iowa 1943-46" (editor).

U.S.A. = Fourth Reich ?
by Michael Luick-Thrams
http://www.traces.org/executive_directorcontent.htm

The Question:

"Those who do not learn from history are doomed to relive it" goes the old adage. As much as we dislike cliches, they are spawned from indelible truths. To what extent, then, have we either failed to learn -- or worse, know but ignore the lessons of -- the Third Reich?

A brief inventory of parallels between Nazi Germany and recent events and trends in the United States offers disturbing clues:
Case Study:

Adolf Hitler came to power "legally"-having received 37% of the popular vote, then finagled a majority coalition -- but with
questionable authority. His was a shaky victory, with marginal popularity. Soon after seizing power, however, a national disaster handed Hitler the license and seeming legitimacy he needed: while questions remain, credible historians maintain that the Nazis torched the Reichstag (home of the German parliament, which they loathed), then blamed it on the communists. In any event, the following day Hitler used the crisis to suspend personal freedom -- never again in the Third
Reich would Germans enjoy legal protection and due process. Ultimately, puppet Volksgerichthoefe (People's Courts) replaced legitimate legal structures and rubber-stamped all Nazi decrees, veiled as "laws".

In tandem to this, in response to the "national emergency" Hitler's regime implemented a massive Gleichschaltung (coordination), which entailed bringing all public bodies under one administration-reaching from the army, navy, coast guard, postal system, municipal as well as national [including secret] police forces, diplomatic corps and civil
service to, eventually, the churches and "independent" clubs for hiking or even bird-watching. Within two months of coming to power, the Nazis also built their first concentration camp, Dachau, to house political
prisoners-in effect, anyone who publicly voiced opposition. The Nazis also mercilessly deported (without effective complaint from the international community) thousands of Ostjuden (Eastern Jews who'd come to Germany since 1918) to Poland -- separate from and preceding the Nazis' later Endloesung (Final Solution) extermination campaign.

From early on, some of Germany's largest companies bankrolled the Nationalsozialist party, thinking that they could steer it to their benefit. Later, their payback would include the regime's supplying the likes of AG Farben, Volkswagen, Krupp and other corporate giants with slave laborers, not to mention padded, monopolistic government contracts. Under fascism, business figures enjoyed power and privilege like never before, as financially the Nazi party became utterly
corrupt, with endless insider favors being dealt to and by the various Gauleiter (local leaders) -- who in turn ran their regions like fiefdoms; they milked "their" dejected Jews down to the last Pfennig -- for example, acquiring Jewish goods and property at liquidation prices, then reselling them at steep profits. The Hitler years were a time of institutionalized profiteering, with the entire German nation becoming the company store of an arrogant, megalomaniac ruling elite.

To credit Hitler himself with so much influence and power, however, is unwarranted. A failed postcard painter and decorator, Adolf Hitler was a man of limited intelligence and ability -- albeit well-endowed with multitudes of complexes, including what today would be called "low self-esteem" and "father issues". Rather, it was the men behind him
(Goebbels, Goering, Himmler, Hess, etc.) who determined much of the government's agenda. For his part, however, Hitler provided a photogenic mouthpiece for the Nazi ruling class' program, and became wildly popular for his "charisma" and "decency"; a tea-totaling vegetarian and child-adoring "nice guy", he promised to restore German society to moral as well as "racial" purity.

Hitler's inner circle included individuals uniquely talented as propagandists. Hitler's face was plastered everywhere; money, children's books, posters and banners, cinema news clips or newspapers and magazines [showing der Fuehrer (the leader) opening sports events or dedicating memorials or walking his dog] with Hitler's portrait all contributed to a huge but hollow personality cult. Throughout the Third Reich's 12-year existence, the angular eagle and the [Nazi] national flag remained ubiquitously present -- sewn on clothes, hanging from house windows and street lamps, stamped onto stationary and
appliances. Fascist Germany became awash with red, white and. black.

Although physically crippled and a social misfit, Josef Goebbels brilliantly orchestrated the effective brainwashing of the masses. He maintained that the bigger the lie, the easier sold -- and if repeated often and long enough, anything could be peddled as Truth. Also, upon seizing power the Nazis focused first on debilitating the opposition;
its Jew-hunting and more generalized propaganda efforts came only later, and then step-by-step, as Goebbels understood that wholesale social control installed bit by bit is more accepted than if forced onto a given population all at once. Second, the Nazis knew that to capture the nation they would have to capture its youth -- so they did. All "acceptable" German youth were forced into one or another youth groups. Their hiking and camping trips, tumbling exercises,
marching drills and group singing, etc. were all unarmed military training. The so-called Reichsarbeitsdienst (Imperial Labor Service) for young men began with marching with shovels slung over their shoulders; guns would follow.

Germany's fascist propaganda machine reached down to all levels of society. Under Nazism, compliant journalists became stenographers, simply regurgitating what was carefully fed them during daily press conferences. Also, the government subsidized Volksempfaenger (people's receivers), so that every home had a radio -- even if they could receive but one channel. And, the Nazis freely stole national symbols and traditions, then warped them to fit their own needs.

One of the cultural icons the Nazis shanghaied was the concept of Heimat (homeland): it became a rallying cry around which countless atrocities would be committed. Then, once the inevitable war erupted, the Nazis similarly used the excuse of "being at war" for depriving their own people of essentials for survival or simply keeping them subservient. And, to keep those on the home front compliant, the government continually dropped the threat of the "[Soviet] Mongolian
hordes" attacking the country.

In the process of abusing the people's traditions and trust, the Nazis betrayed Germans' sense of national pride and ambition, using both for their own, illicit ends. They did not just appeal, however, to the German people's greatest dreams (retribution and self-respect after a perceived assault on their nation at Versailles, an enhanced national moral character through fighting "evil" Jewish/Bolshevik decadence, etc.), but to their lowest instincts (i.e. fear, self-protection and group think). Through fear, the Nazis were able to control an entire country of over 65 million individuals. While free-
thinkers knew that dissenting would land them in a KZ (short for "concentration camp"), too many average people believed Hitler's eternal ranting about internal enemies (most notably the Jews and, early on, pacifists and "internationalists" who supposedly had sabotaged Germany during the "Great War"), as well as external ones (the French and British, the "Bolshevik menace" in the Soviet Union, the Poles, etc.).

Of the last group, the Nazis used the threat of Polish "terrorists" to whip the Germans into a hateful hysteria, which climaxed in the summer of 1939 and handed Berlin an excuse to invade Poland: putting KZ prisoners in Polish uniforms, then shooting them to look like Polish casualties during a staged "attack" on the German-language radio station at Gleiwitz (a provincial eastern-German border town), the SS provided a sham provocation for Germany's launching-out of "self
defense"-what became WW II.

Even before WW II broke out, Nazi Germany cultivated a role of international isolation, oddly blended with self-serving
accommodation. On one hand it unilaterally withdrew from global agreements it found unacceptable or hindersome (the fledgling League of Nations, reparation and debt payments, etc.), but on the other it sealed cynical pacts with world players in order to buy them off (e.g., the Concordant with the Vatican, a Non-Aggression Pact with the Soviets). Germans were fed a go-it-alone explanation of the world situation and largely bought it, having been duped by relentless
domestic propaganda efforts.

In reality, cynicism and deception were two of the few consistent aspects of the Nazi regime. It declared independent labor unions illegal, for example, then bought workers' compliance with subsidized Alpine ski trips, Norwegian fjord cruises or Baltic-coast beach vacations, organized by the Kraft durch Freude (Strength through Joy) program. In fact, virtually everything the Nazi regime ever said or did for public consumption was, in reality, meant to accomplish the opposite. The Winterhilfsaktion (Winter Aid Campaign) was supposed to deliver assistance to those in need, yet the state plundered well-
intended citizens' contributions of goods and monies. Jews being "resettled" to the East were instructed to bring their most precious belongings-making their organized theft all the easier; perhaps even more obscene, surviving relatives not yet deported received "burial costs" bills for family murdered in death camps. In short, in its whole 12-year reign, the Nazi machinery hardly made a statement or made a move not designed to commit -- or at least mask -- ill. Till the end, however, ordinary citizens stubbornly clung to a plethora of patent lies and baseless propaganda as The Truth.

In truth, from the beginning the Nazis had no genuine political program, other than what strengthened their own hand; their very survival depended on being able to wage war and thereby subjugate all of Europe. A land with relatively few natural resources and too many people, Germany needed uncontested access to, say, the coal mines of France and the agricultural lands of Denmark and the Ukraine, the ore of Norway and the oil of the Southern Soviet Republics -- with acquisition to such resources cloaked behind a push for Lebensraum (living space). Its morally bankrupt regime also needed "endless war" in order to rationalize its own existence.

Like a parasite in a laboratory petri dish, the Nazi monster -- lacking the legitimate right to rule or a genuine social program to sustain domestic support-had to consume its neighbors in other to survive. It therefore felt compelled to "redraw the map" of Europe if it were to remain in power (with some of its neighboring countries disappearing, others being divided and still others surviving, but under bogus regimes), for without expansion and the exploitation of external resources, the Nazi regime simply would have consumed itself and disappeared.

Some Comparisons:

Listing in detail the sobering similarities between the Nazi regime's treacherous Third Reich and the hamstrung country that George W. Bush's shadowy team has been forging since autumn 2001 would be too repetitive to warrant. Those who are better-informed know about the sinister sides of the so-called Patriot and Homeland Security Acts, as well as
the detention (without charges) of more than an estimated thousand U.S. residents, denied legal representation and, in part, deported -- like Hitler's deportation of Ostjuden, often erroneously, to countries with which they had no personal connections. Informed people also know of the Bush administration's unilateral withdraw from the Kyoto Accord,
previous arms agreements with the Russians, international war-crimes commissions and global birth-/HIV-control programs.

Citing the omnipresence of flags and vengeful-eyed bald eagles on posters and poetry, notebooks, book sleeves, T-shirts and tennis shoes in public schools, however, might be news to some. In his work, this author often visits schools and is increasingly alarmed by the grip such mindless nationalism has on our young people, who seem eager -- or at the very least, unsuspecting cannon fodder. On a more formal level, you may not know that the Pentagon has ordered all public schools to submit comprehensive lists of all recruitable young men -- those which refuse no longer will receive Federal funds. After all, the way to most effectively "catch a nation" is to catch its youth.

Echoing the burning of the Reichstag, fundamental questions regarding the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 remain unanswered-and will, as long as Bush sits in the White House: certainly, Henry Kissinger never would have delivered a critical report, given his own clandestine past and obligations. Still, an independent inquiry and rational
public debate is warranted, but blocked at every level -- not the smallest hindrance being Bush's acts of removing presidential papers reaching back as far as Ronald Reagan from the public's realm. What connections or crimes do Bush's string-pullers wish to so tightly lock away? Why is the truth so threatening to them and their designs for
the world's future?

From early on, some of the U.S.A.'s largest companies have bankrolled Bush's political ambitions. Their payback likely has not yet been fully redeemed, but until now the collapse of Bush's biggest presidential-campaign contributor, Enron, has not been adequately investigated, nor its executives prosecuted for financial wrongdoing.
Other energy giants helped dictate the nation's current fossil-fuel-focused energy policy -- some of whom recently were revealed as price-gougers during California's 'rolling brown-outs'. It seems that yet other campaign contributors (in medicine, auto manufacturing, insurance) are set to receive padded government contracts or special
consideration as new bills are passed, and, in the case of dirty industries, reprieves from earlier pollution control standards.

Although physically disabled and publicly unpopular, Dick Cheney brilliantly orchestrates the Bush White House's strategy, to the point of being President-in-effect. Within days of the 2001 attack, the Bush administration warned the nation that its "war on terrorism" would "take years" and require a "total effort": what that "war" might
entail has been revealed step-by-step, as the Cheney-led White House understands that managing public perceptions is most effective if done bit by bit. In stages, "anonymous sources" have "leaked" that the U.S. Army no longer is to be as much an offensive force, but an occupying one -- and that the administration considers "redrawing the map" of the
Middle East, with the governments of Iran, Syria and even our "ally" Saudi Arabia in its cross-hairs.

Too, [perhaps fictional] "terrorist alerts" on either coast for more than a year have contributed to keeping the American public fearful and thus compliant, while universal smallpox inoculations of dubious content and value now are touted as necessary. (Who dares question what might really be in that "vaccine" that all of us are to submit to like
lambs?)

Hitler knew that conquering the Soviet Union would necessitate Germany's fighting partisan resistance for the duration of its occupation of that vast region, but thought such protracted military engagement would keep the German Volk (people) "fit", the military budget strong and the population at home distracted from the lack of social projects. The Bush team, too, can only profit from a crisis-mode guns-and-butter Federal budget and national economy, for nothing makes a people more defenseless and malleable than the constant, numbing fear of attack -- either real or fictional.

Similarly, long the battlefield of Europe's historical struggles for continental power (the Thirty Years' War, the Napoleonic War, etc.), long before Hitler came to power the Germans suffered a self-righteous victim complex that rationalized for many of them their brutal behavior under Nazism. The terrorist attacks in fall 2002 constituted a genuine national tragedy, but there was a world on the 10th of September, too: the United States is not without its history of supporting dictatorial
regimes and institutionalized injustice around the world; the image of us as a nation of "innocent victims" is flawed and debatable -- but also manipulable by leaders willing to squeeze out of our sufferings every drop they're worth. With the ever-present "Soviet threat" of the Cold War years (and the "Bolshevik threat" of the '20s, or the "Anarchist and bomb-throwers threat" of the turn of the last century) gone, how convenient the appearance of "international
terrorism" for those with no other claim to rule than a giddy willingness to wage endless war. (How many dictators have you ever seen pictured in anything but military uniforms? Illegitimate regimes require war or the threat of war in
order to rationalize their existence, for without, one cannot.)

Like a parasite in a laboratory petri dish, America's corporate-run government-lacking a true popular mandate to rule or a genuine social program to sustain domestic support-must consume other lands' natural resources in other to survive. It therefore must "redraw the map" of the Middle East if American control of the world's finite oil sources is to prevail. Without such control over and the exploitation of diminishing resources, the corporate-sponsored Bush administration
(interested only in Orwellian "Homeland Security" and endless tax breaks for the rich) simply would consume itself, as it lacks a genuine popular mandate or serious social policies separate from waging war.

A Warning:
Having interviewed over 40 one-time European refugees or American volunteers who saved them, and more than 50 former German POWs who had been imprisoned in my native Iowa during WW II, I possess a view of the Third Reich different than most. Understanding Nazism through the eyes of both its "victims" and its "executioners", I have researched the
failure of democracy, the rise of dictatorship and its attendant militarism, and the ravages of world war. I also know the stigma that Germans still endure for the crimes against humanity that their parents and grandparents stood by and watched happen or, worse, themselves committed during the Third Reich.

Just as "innocent draftees" later claimed that they simply had "followed orders" during their murderous occupation of Eastern Europe, and just as even Nazi officials refused any responsibility for atrocities as they simply had "followed orders", to the extent that Americans now simply "follow orders" given by disingenuous leaders to
conquer and then occupy first Iraq, then per plan other Middle Eastern countries, will Americans risk becoming the "Nazis" of the 21st century. We stand on the brink of launching an orgy of organized murder in the pursuit of legalized theft; in the process, any remaining strands of "democracy", let alone decency, will be shredded like so many Enron records, as driven by hysteria we do the bidding of illegitimate masters and become the pariahs of the entire world. In the course of invading and ruling with an iron hand countries far away, we will attempt (ultimately, in vain) to execute such an implausible
mission through force -- and undoubtedly commit countless atrocities.

As a historian and a Quaker, I plead with my compatriots to recognize the potential dangers posed to us not just by international terrorism, but moreover by possible domestic deception and its accompanying oppression -- and to see this dynamic before it is too late to halt and reverse. History will judge us, no matter what we do: it is our moral
imperative to refuse collusion with sinister forces within our own nation who would use our collective tragedy of a year ago as a pretext for their own self-serving agenda.
Back to top
 
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 12:58 am    Post subject: Zionist planned Iraq 'regime change' before Bush Presidency Reply to topic

Bush planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President:

http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=1970
Back to top
 
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:23 am    Post subject: 9/11 Hijacker Attended US military School Reply to topic

9/11 Hijacker Attended US military School:

http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=1968
Back to top
 
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:29 am    Post subject: Fisk: ploughing on to war in Iraq but avoiding N. Korea Reply to topic

Fisk: ploughing on to war in Iraq, which has oil, but avoiding war in Korea:

http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=366199
Back to top
 
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:30 am    Post subject: 100,000 offer to be human shields Reply to topic

100,000 offer to be human shields

http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=2073
Back to top
 
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:35 am    Post subject: American & Brit Volunteers as 'Human Shield' in Iraq Reply to topic

American & Brit Volunteers as 'Human Shield' in Iraq:

http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=1983
Back to top
 
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 1:38 am    Post subject: BRITS PULL SUPPORT FOR IRAQ INVASION TO THWART ZIONISTS Reply to topic

BRITS PULL SUPPORT FOR IRAQ INVASION TO THWART ZIONISTS:

http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=1798
Back to top
 
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 2:05 am    Post subject: Zionists Influencing US/Britain to Invade Iraq for Israel Reply to topic

Zionists Influencing US/Britain to Invade Iraq for Israel:

http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=1946
Back to top
 
Jefferson Davis



Joined: 07 Sep 2002
Posts: 14583

PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 3:51 am    Post subject: Reply to topic

Hitler asked for a plebescite and got a large majority vote for his Emergency Decree from the German populace. (source, Manchester's" WSC, Alone") There has been no equivalent or any suspension of civil rights in the US in anyway transferring power to Bush like Hitler's Enabling Act. Untill elections are suppressed there is no comparison. In fact, the United States and the Confederate States are the few, if only who have ever conducted national general elections during a civil war. I think that to compare the Third Reich vs the US is disingenuous. Not that the dangers aren't non-existant but I can't jump to his conclusions yet.

And for the author to conclude that Hitler was not intelligent goes against what he attained and achieved in such a short time. The evil he perpetuated were not the acts of a simple man. I'm no admirer but he was an evil genius and brilliantly took advantage of his times and used them to his fullest advantahe and there is not a single biography that I have read that has ever concluded he was not intelligent.

There a a lot of historical judgement and mere points of views being passed off as fact. For a thesis, I would give it a C- to a D.

Sorry, can't buy the comparisions yet as existing in the USA, my .02
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2003 4:18 am    Post subject: 'DON'T DIE FOR ISRAEL' Reply to topic

> A Review by Dr. Susan Huck of "ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL," by Andrew
> Hurley
>
> Editor comments: Thank you Dr. Susan Huck.
>
> The following powerful one-page review of ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL by
> career journalist and book author Dr. Susan Huck is the most incisive
> review yet. It again reminds your Editor that this book was Andrew
> Hurley's life literary work, resulting from 20 years of careful data
> collection and writing.
>
> Hurley chose, because of the nature of his business relationships, to
> wait until his retirement to publish ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL. Each
> paragraph and every word was mulled over time and time again before
> it was finally printed. Only the clearest facts and conclusions
> survived. The result was this impeccable book.
>
> It was my honor to know Jim Hurley before his death last year, and to
> hear of the many antidotes he did not include, and some he could not
> include. Andrew J. Hurley (Jim) lived an abundant and adventurous
> life that would seem enviable to most of us. However It is my belief
> that he will someday be remembered, not for his business successes,
> but for this, his one and only book.
>
> ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL is the one book we know of that has yet to be
> seriously challenged on any material fact, and nary a detail has been
> upended since WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS published it as our first book.
> Hurley wrote ONUI believing that millions of live were at risk, and
> that he could make a difference.
>
> Thanks to Jim Hurley; we will do our best to help the world remember
> and honor him - Editor.
>
> DON'T DIE FOR ISRAEL
>
> A Review by Dr. Susan Huck of ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL, by Andrew
> Hurley
>
> The original title of this 1990 book, "Holocaust II? Saving
> Israel from Suicide", perhaps more accurately reflected the author's
> concern that aggressive Israeli policies might ultimately lead to
> disaster for Israel. However, the current title very accurately
> reflects the current American, as distinct from the Israeli problem.
> It details, as truthfully as any source I have seen, the manner in
> which Uncle Sam is converted into Uncle Schlemiel, Israel's 900-pound
> gorilla.
>
> The theme of suicidal Jewish zealotry is outlined in Hurley's
> first chapter, which draws upon A History of the Jews, by Dr. Abram
> Sachar, once president of Brandeis University. Far from the tale of
> continual undeserved victimhood constantly served to the public,
> Sachar demonstrates how, from a thousand years before the birth of
> Christ, Jewish tribes and states kept getting into needless
> difficulties with both friend and foe.
>
> Ah, but such a perspective does not serve current
> purposes. "We" non-Jews must be kept guilt-ridden and "obliged" to
> grovel, pay, and otherwise sacrifice ourselves for Jews. An Anti-
> Defamation League catalogue of "educational" material emphasizes the
> theme of victimhood and martyrdom at the hands of Christians, as in
> The Longest Hatred -- "from the Cross to the Swastika." The ADL's
> concept of a "good Christian" is one who sacrifices himself for the
> Jews. It is sad to see the American armed forces being set up to
> serve as "good Christians" for Israel.
>
> Hurley's book was originally published in 1990, before "Gulf
> War I," the Bush 41 war. The re-titled but not revised edition was
> published in 1999, apparently missing by just a few years "Gulf War
> II," or the Bush 43 war scheduled for 2003. Nothing, it seems, will
> deter President George Bush from initiating the all-out war on Iraq
> being pressed by a Jewish cabal within his administration. Jewish
> enthusiasts look forward to it as the beginning of "World War IV" to
> forcibly "re-educate" all Moslems everywhere, beginning with Israel's
> closest foes.
>
> As the preface to ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL explains, lawyer
> and historian Andrew Hurley does much more than examine Jewish
> history. He explains -- at length and with "documentation," the
> methods by which the Jewish lobby in the United States controls "our"
> federal government. The carrot is money, the stick is public
> smearing, followed if necessary by deprivation of livelihood.
>
> American and Israeli Jews collaborate seamlessly to bulldoze
> Congress and the entire executive branch into sending an
> uninterrupted stream of money, military hardware, and whatever else
> is wanted to Israel. Congressman Larry McDonald, who was on the
> research and development subcommittee of the House Armed Services
> Committee, once told me that "we wouldn't even have an R & D program
> if Israel didn't want us to," because the fruits of taxpayer-funded R
> & D, he knew, were funneled straight to Israel.
>
> The Israelis then feel free to market it, by the way. Hurley
> explains this in great detail. No cabinet member, not to mention mere
> bureaucrat, can stand in the way of this continual transfer of
> wealth, because the Jews can "go over the head" of anyone of any
> rank.
>
> Hurley, writing in 1990, could not have known that George
> Bush's father, Bush 41, would "learn" that he lost his 1992 re-
> election campaign because he merely delayed a "loan guarantee" to
> Israel. (That is, he delayed guaranteeing that if Israel
> defaulted, "our" government would pay. In any event, our annual multi-
> billion dollar gifts to Israel easily cover Israel's debts.) Young
> Bush 43 has been keenly monitored ever since he loomed on the horizon
> as a candidate. The ADL boasts of this.
>
> In short, Hurley's book is a manual of "how they do it,"
> filled with examples as of 1990. In 2003, "how they do it" has simply
> become more blatant, as Jewish "neocons" -- so-called neo-
> conservatives -- pack the administration with armchair warhawks and
> are apparently capable of employing the American armed forces as
> their own.
>
> By employing mere name-calling as a first-line weapon, the
> goyim are reduced to jellyfish. Why does anyone respond to
> accusations of "anti-Semitism" with other than a patient smile and
> the comment, "That won't work, either"?
>
> If the silly goyim ever wake up and do that, the United
> States might cease to be ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL. -end
>
> (Reviewer, Dr. Susan Huck's latest book "WHY DO WE AMERICAN SUBMIT TO
> THIS" By Newcomb Publisher's Inc., is now available from We Hold
> These Truths, $20.00)
>
> To Buy ONE NATION UNDER ISRAEL, 345 page soft cover, $17.50; 2 for
> $35.00; 10 for $128.00. (http://www.whtt.org/bookstor.htm)
>
> We Hold These Truths
> P.O. Box 14491
> Scottsdale, AZ 85254
> 480-947-3329
>
> To subscribe, type "Subscribe" in the SUBJECT LINE.
> To unsubscribe, type "Remove" in the SUBJECT LINE.
>
>


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
WORDS are Stronger than SWORDS! ~ Spread the words to the Wilderness!
++++++++++++++++++++++ eFreePalestine ++++++++++++++++++++++
eFreePalestine is America's Secular WILDERNESS VOICE for PALESTINE!*
http://www.freepalestine.com/ No Peace Without Occupation Free PALESTINE!
++++++++++++++++++++++ eFreePalestine ++++++++++++++++++++++
Blessed are the Peacemakers NOT the Warmongers!
Chronic INJUSTICE is the ROOT of TERRORISM!
Fighting TERRORISM while AIDING OCCUPATION is Moronic!
END TERRORISM by ENDING Israeli OCCUPATION Stupid!
SHARON NOW = MILOSEVIC Then = HITLER IN 1942!
Peace Only in a Legislatively DEzIONIZED Secular State!
Aiding Israeli OCCUPATION = Aiding TERRORISM!
Where Does Our Simplistic Absolutist President Stand?!
++++++++++++++++++++++ eFreePalestine ++++++++++++++++++++++
http://www.badil.org/ The RIGHT of RETURN!
http://www.indictsharon.net/ Indict the BUTCHER!
http://www.pmwatch.org/ PALESTINE MEDIA WATCH!
http://www.palestineremembered.com/ PALESTINE for DUMMIES!
http://www.freepalestinecampaign.org/ Be a Peacemaker in PALESTINE!
http://www.internationalanswer.org/ Act Now to STOP WAR and End RACISM
www.capwiz.com/ADC/home/ Tell Congress to Stop Aid to Israel!
www.Al-Awda.org/petition.htm END zIONIST Profit from OCCUPATION!
http://www.ramallahonline.com/ Our Occupied Home in Ramallah PALESTINE!
www.groups.Yahoo.com/group/eFreePalestine/messages ARCHIVES!
http://www.palestinechronicle.com/ News and Views from PALESTINE!
http://www.documentaryphotographs.com/ Pictures from PALESTINE!
http://www.palestinemonitor.org/ Monitor PALESTINE!
http://www.wrmea.com/ zIONIST-Free MEDIA!
++++++++++++++++++++++ eFreePalestine ++++++++++++++++++++++
eFreePalestine-subscribe@YahooGroups.com SUBSCRIBE NOW Smile
eFreePalestine-unsubscribe@YahooGroups.com Unsubscribe Sad
eFreePalestine@YahooGroups.com Speak up on eFreePalestine!
eFreePalestine-owner@YahooGroups.com Questions/Comments!
Views expressed are the author's only*
++++++++++++++++++++++ eFreePalestine ++++++++++++++++++++++

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Back to top
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    War Without End Forum Index -> Middle East and Asia All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group